So I am attending a conference in San Francisco, the Inbound Marketing Summit. There are great speakers here, mostly riffing on the changes that are happening in the media world. Right now I am listening to Chris Brogan talk about the power that bloggers hold in the new media world where everyone can be a publisher. Many predictions from many speakers that daily newspapers won’t even be around in five years. People are struggle with accepting that our news and information will come from blogs, such as this one, because there is this issue of journalistic quality and trust. Even printed media institutions are now printing things that point to their eventual demise. Here’s a bit of irony for you: Barry Diller was quoted in today’s printed USAToday (hey, I didn’t buy it, it was left outside my hotel room door. Oh wait. I did buy it. Marriott built it into my rate, and I didn’t notice the opt-out tiny print on my keycard packet until I was checking out) as saying if you have ink on your hands, meaning you are in the print advertising business, you are finished. Here’s a link to the article and more with Barry Diller. So, what does this have to do with Park City? I think the point is, it comes back to two A’s: authority and authenticity. I think authority can be faked, and authenticity cannot. Newsmedia journalists get the authority just for showing up. That doesn’t make them authentic. What do you think?
- No trackbacks yet.
#1 by Krista Parry - April 29th, 2009 at 09:00
I completely agree with the point that you made about Authority. It’s interesting to me that many non-new media folks still consider traditional journalists to have more authority than bloggers. Tell me what the reach of a printed article in SKI magazine has over a blog post by someone who has a huge sphere of influence. Who has the authority? And why are we not considering bloggers journalists?
It will be interesting to see where this all goes.
#2 by admin - April 29th, 2009 at 09:29
KRP: ink-people are clinging to the last thing they have, the perception that they are trusted because they work for established media institutions, hence the old concept of Authority. The problem for them is Authority in the digital space is defined by how many people link to your content, Digg your post, bookmark you on Delicious. Authority in journalism will now become a by-product (or an earned reward) for creating good content (Authenticity). Is this the Virtuous Cycle in media, or what?!
#3 by Eric Hoffman - April 30th, 2009 at 17:36
You are both spot on about the demise of the traditional media but it’s not just bloggers that are publishing information. It’s someone posting a video of a Senator calling him a nasty name on YouTube, or a TwitPic of the US Airways jet floating in the Hudson. News is moving quicker and quicker via the web and the old news gathering apparatus is being dismantled because it can’t move as quickly as a world wide army of content creators.